Comparison

Kajmak vs Kajmak

Overall, Kajmak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKajmakKajmak
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 357 kcal 449 kcal
Fat 35.7 g 45 g
Saturated fat 28.6 g 32 g
Sugars 3.6 g 5 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 6 g
Additives60
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kajmak has 20% fewer calories (357 kcal vs 449 kcal).
  • Kajmak has 21% less fat (35.7 g vs 45 g).
  • Kajmak has 11% less saturated fat (28.6 g vs 32 g).
  • Kajmak has 29% less sugar (3.6 g vs 5 g).
  • Kajmak has 33% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Kajmak has 100% more protein (6 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Kajmak lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Kajmak

Pasteurized Sheep's Milk, Salt, Cheese Cultures, Pasteurized Whole Milk, Vinegar, Soybean Oil, Partially Hydrogenated Soybean Oil, Water, Butter, Sweet Cream Buttermilk Solids, Lecithin, Mono & Di-glycerides, Sodium Benzonate, Potassium Sorbate, Artif. Butter Flavor, Beta Carotene (Color), Vitamin A Palmitate,4 Pasteurized Cultured Milk and Cream, Stabilizers

Kajmak

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kajmak or Kajmak?

Overall, Kajmak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kajmak has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kajmak has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons