Kajmak vs Kajmak
Overall, Kajmak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kajmak | Kajmak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 28.6 g | 14.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kajmak has 30% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Kajmak has 30% less fat (25 g vs 35.7 g).
- Kajmak has 50% less saturated fat (14.3 g vs 28.6 g).
- Kajmak has no sugar, while Kajmak has 3.6 g.
- Kajmak has 35% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Kajmak has 100% more protein (7.1 g vs 0 g).
- Kajmak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kajmak lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kajmak
Pasteurized Sheep's Milk, Salt, Cheese Cultures, Pasteurized Whole Milk, Vinegar, Soybean Oil, Partially Hydrogenated Soybean Oil, Water, Butter, Sweet Cream Buttermilk Solids, Lecithin, Mono & Di-glycerides, Sodium Benzonate, Potassium Sorbate, Artif. Butter Flavor, Beta Carotene (Color), Vitamin A Palmitate,4 Pasteurized Cultured Milk and Cream, Stabilizers
Kajmak
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kajmak or Kajmak?
Overall, Kajmak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kajmak has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kajmak has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.