Comparison
Kajmak vs Kajmak
Overall, Kajmak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kajmak | Kajmak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 449 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 45 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.3 g | 32 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kajmak has 44% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 449 kcal).
- Kajmak has 44% less fat (25 g vs 45 g).
- Kajmak has 55% less saturated fat (14.3 g vs 32 g).
- Kajmak has no sugar, while Kajmak has 5 g.
- Kajmak has 16% more protein (7.1 g vs 6 g).
- Kajmak has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kajmak
Not available.
Kajmak
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kajmak or Kajmak?
Overall, Kajmak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kajmak has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kajmak has less sugar: 0 g versus 5 g per 100 g.