Comparison

Kajmak vs Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu

Overall, Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKajmakKajmak - Masa krówkowa o sma...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 449 kcal 291 kcal
Fat 45 g 5.1 g
Saturated fat 32 g 2.4 g
Sugars 5 g 43 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.1 g
Protein 6 g 5.3 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 35% fewer calories (291 kcal vs 449 kcal).
  • Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 89% less fat (5.1 g vs 45 g).
  • Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 93% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 32 g).
  • Kajmak has 88% less sugar (5 g vs 43 g).
  • Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Kajmak has 12% more protein (6 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Kajmak

Not available.

Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu

cukier, woda, _mleko_ w proszku odtłuszczone 16%, olej palmowy, emulgator: lecytyny (z _soi_), aromat. Produkt może zawierać gluten

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kajmak or Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu?

Overall, Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kajmak has less sugar: 5 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons