Kaymak vs Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu
Overall, Kaymak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaymak | Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o sma... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 239 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 5.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 43 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaymak has 18% fewer calories (239 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 77% less fat (5.1 g vs 22.5 g).
- Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 84% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 15.1 g).
- Kaymak has 93% less sugar (3 g vs 43 g).
- Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu has 79% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Kaymak has 12% more protein (6 g vs 5.3 g).
- Kaymak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kaymak
Pasteurized cream, Pasteurized cow's milk, Table salt, Lactic acid cultures
Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu
cukier, woda, _mleko_ w proszku odtłuszczone 16%, olej palmowy, emulgator: lecytyny (z _soi_), aromat. Produkt może zawierać gluten
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaymak or Kajmak - Masa krówkowa o smaku Tiramisu?
Overall, Kaymak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaymak has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaymak has less sugar: 3 g versus 43 g per 100 g.