Comparison
Kajmak vs Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kajmak | Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówko... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 287 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.3 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kajmak has 13% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 287 kcal).
- Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym has 78% less fat (5.5 g vs 25 g).
- Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym has 82% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 14.3 g).
- Kajmak has no sugar, while Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym has 47 g.
- Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Kajmak has 19% more protein (7.1 g vs 5.8 g).
- Only Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kajmak
Not available.
Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym
cukier, woda, _mleko_ w proszku odtłuszczone 16%, olej palmowy, emulgator: lecytyny (z _soi_). Produkt może zawierać gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kajmak or Bakalland Kajmak Masa Krówkowa o Smaku Tradycyjnym?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kajmak has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kajmak has less sugar: 0 g versus 47 g per 100 g.