Comparison

Kabanosy drobiowe vs Filet d’ardenne

Overall, Filet d’ardenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKabanosy drobioweFilet d’ardenne
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 271 kcal 143 kcal
Fat 17 g 3 g
Saturated fat 5.6 g 1.1 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.9 g
Salt 1.3 g 4.4 g
Fiber 4.8 g —
Protein 25 g 28 g
Additives13
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet d’ardenne has 47% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 271 kcal).
  • Filet d’ardenne has 82% less fat (3 g vs 17 g).
  • Filet d’ardenne has 80% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Kabanosy drobiowe has 71% less salt (1.3 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Filet d’ardenne has 11% more protein (28 g vs 25 g).
  • Kabanosy drobiowe has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filet d’ardenne lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Kabanosy drobiowe

Mięso z kurczaka, mięso z indyka, skrobia, sól, substancja żelująca: alginian sodu; błonnik pszenny bezglutenowy, przyprawy, aromaty, cukier, acerola w proszku.

Filet d’ardenne

Viande de porc, sel, épices, plantes INGREDIENT aromatiques, extraits d'épices, arôme, oignon, ail, antioxydant: E301; conservateur: E250, E252; ferments, fumée, traitement de surface: conservateur: E202 Peut contenir des traces de: lait. Filet d'Ardevise 100 g de produit préparé à partir de 123 g de viande. Emballé sous atmosphère protectrice. Pour un goût optimal, dégustez-le 15 min après ouverture.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kabanosy drobiowe or Filet d’ardenne?

Overall, Filet d’ardenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet d’ardenne has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kabanosy drobiowe has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons