Jumbo Beef Franks vs Beef
Overall, Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jumbo Beef Franks | Beef |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 306 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 27.1 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.6 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 19.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef, Soybeans | Beef |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beef has 59% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 306 kcal).
- Beef has 77% less fat (6.3 g vs 27.1 g).
- Beef has 58% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 10.6 g).
- Beef has 78% less salt (0.5 g vs 2.4 g).
- Beef has 40% more protein (19.6 g vs 11.8 g).
- Beef has the better Nutri-Score.
- Beef is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Jumbo Beef Franks lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Jumbo Beef Franks
BEEF, WATER, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SALT, SPICE, SODIUM ACRATE PAPRIKA, HYDROLYZED SOY PROTEIN, GARLIC POWDER, SODIUM DIACETATE, SODIUM ERYTHORBATE, FLAVORING, SODIUM NITRITE.
Beef
Beef, sea salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jumbo Beef Franks or Beef?
Overall, Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beef has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jumbo Beef Franks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.