Comparison
Jabuka vs Pommes bicolores
Overall, Pommes bicolores has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jabuka | Pommes bicolores |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 10.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 10.1 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes bicolores has 66% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 144 kcal).
- Pommes bicolores has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 10.8 g).
- Pommes bicolores has 100% less saturated fat (0 g vs 4.1 g).
- Jabuka has 89% less sugar (1.1 g vs 10.1 g).
- Pommes bicolores has no salt, while Jabuka has 1.3 g.
- Pommes bicolores has 82% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.2 g).
- Jabuka has 96% more protein (6.6 g vs 0.3 g).
- Pommes bicolores has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jabuka
jabuka
Pommes bicolores
Pommes
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jabuka or Pommes bicolores?
Overall, Pommes bicolores has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes bicolores has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jabuka has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 10.1 g per 100 g.