Comparison

Insalata di patate vs Veganer Salat - Kartoffelsalat

Overall, Insalata di patate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientInsalata di patateVeganer Salat - Kartoffelsal...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 119 kcal 219 kcal
Fat 6 g 18 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.4 g
Sugars 2.4 g 4.2 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.6 g
Fiber 2 g 1 g
Protein 1.5 g 1.1 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedMustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Insalata di patate has 46% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 219 kcal).
  • Insalata di patate has 67% less fat (6 g vs 18 g).
  • Insalata di patate has 71% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Insalata di patate has 43% less sugar (2.4 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Insalata di patate has 33% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Insalata di patate has 50% more fiber (2 g vs 1 g).
  • Insalata di patate has 27% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Insalata di patate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Veganer Salat - Kartoffelsalat lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Insalata di patate

Not available.

Veganer Salat - Kartoffelsalat

50 % Kartoffeln, Rapsöl, Wasser, 7,5 % Gurken, Zucker, 2% Zwiebeln, Speisesalz, Stärke, Branntweinessig, Säureregulator: Natriumacetate; modifizierte Stärke, Petersilie, Säuerungsmittel: Essigsäure; Maltodextrin, Senfsaat, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Xanthan, Johannisbrotkernmehl; Dextrose, Gewürze, natürliches Aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Insalata di patate or Veganer Salat - Kartoffelsalat?

Overall, Insalata di patate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Insalata di patate has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 219 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Insalata di patate has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons