Comparison

In Kat vs Zero Chip Choco

Overall, Zero Chip Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientIn KatZero Chip Choco
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 548 kcal 454 kcal
Fat 31.6 g 24 g
Saturated fat 30.2 g 6 g
Sugars 56 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0 g 4 g
Protein 2.8 g 6 g
Additives46
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Zero Chip Choco has 17% fewer calories (454 kcal vs 548 kcal).
  • Zero Chip Choco has 24% less fat (24 g vs 31.6 g).
  • Zero Chip Choco has 80% less saturated fat (6 g vs 30.2 g).
  • Zero Chip Choco has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 56 g).
  • In Kat has 66% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Zero Chip Choco has 100% more fiber (4 g vs 0 g).
  • Zero Chip Choco has 53% more protein (6 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Zero Chip Choco has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only In Kat lists: Milk.

Ingredients

In Kat

Azúcar, aceite vegetal fraccionado e hidrogenado (palmiste), arroz dilatado con azúcar (12%), cacao en polvo, suero de leche, leche en polvo, manteca, emulsionante lecitina de soya y poliglicerol, saborizantes idénticos a natural y artificial, aceite de maravilla y soya (antioxidante TBHQ y BHT), harina de trigo.

Zero Chip Choco

Harina de trigo, azúcar, aceite de girasol, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, cacao en polvo, gasificantes (bicarbonato sódico, bicarbonato amónico), sal, emulgente (lecitina de soja), aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: In Kat or Zero Chip Choco?

Overall, Zero Chip Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zero Chip Choco has fewer calories: 454 kcal versus 548 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Zero Chip Choco has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 56 g per 100 g.

More comparisons