Comparison
Hure de porc vs Lard salé
Overall, Hure de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hure de porc | Lard salé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 142 kcal | 299 kcal |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hure de porc has 53% fewer calories (142 kcal vs 299 kcal).
- Hure de porc has 46% less fat (9.1 g vs 17 g).
- Hure de porc has 48% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 6.5 g).
- Lard salé has no sugar, while Hure de porc has 0.8 g.
- Hure de porc has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- Lard salé has 28% more protein (18 g vs 13 g).
- Hure de porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hure de porc
Not available.
Lard salé
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hure de porc or Lard salé?
Overall, Hure de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hure de porc has fewer calories: 142 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lard salé has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.