Comparison
Hörnli Gross vs Risoni
Overall, Risoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hörnli Gross | Risoni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 336 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risoni has 50% less fat (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Risoni has 63% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Risoni has 60% less sugar (1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Risoni has no salt, while Hörnli Gross has 0.5 g.
- Risoni has 42% more fiber (5.2 g vs 3 g).
- Risoni has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Hörnli Gross lists: Eggs, Gluten.
Ingredients
Hörnli Gross
Hartweizengriess, Vollei 13.5% (Freilandhaltung)
Risoni
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hörnli Gross or Risoni?
Overall, Risoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risoni has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Risoni has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.