Comparison

HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate vs HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Protein

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Choco...HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Prote...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 406 kcal 450 kcal
Fat 13 g 19.5 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 2.5 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 22 g 19.2 g
Protein 11 g 22.7 g
Additives11
AllergensGluten, BléGluten, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate has 33% less fat (13 g vs 19.5 g).
  • HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Protein has 14% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate has 13% more fiber (22 g vs 19.2 g).
  • HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Protein has 52% more protein (22.7 g vs 11 g).
  • Only HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate lists: Blé.
  • Only HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Protein lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate

Flocons d'avoine complets 44%, Fibres végétales 18%, Flocons d'épeautre complets 8%, Farine de riz 8%, Pâte de cacao 7%, Farine de blé 7%, Huile de tournesol 5%, Poudre de cacao 3%, Antioxydant: extrait riche en tocophérols

HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Protein

Volkoren havervlokken 43%,Cichoreiwortelvezel 18%,Tarwe-eiwit 14%,Zonnebloemolie 8%,Zonnebloempitten 4%,Pompoenpitten 4%,Tarwegluten 3%,Rijstebloem 2%,Amandelen 2%,Hazelnoten 2%,tocoferolrijk extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate or HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Protein?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate has fewer calories: 406 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

HOLIE'S Crunchy Muesli Chocolate has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons