Himalayan vs Sea salt Extra dark chocolate 72%
Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Himalayan | Sea salt Extra dark chocolat... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 587 kcal | 570 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 27 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Himalayan has no saturated fat, while Sea salt Extra dark chocolate 72% has 27 g.
- Himalayan has no sugar, while Sea salt Extra dark chocolate 72% has 25 g.
- Himalayan has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Himalayan lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Himalayan
Pâte de cacao, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, poudre de vanille naturelle, sel.
Sea salt Extra dark chocolate 72%
Pâte de cacao, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, sel (0,4%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Himalayan or Sea salt Extra dark chocolate 72%?
Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sea salt Extra dark chocolate 72% has fewer calories: 570 kcal versus 587 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Himalayan has less sugar: 0 g versus 25 g per 100 g.