Comparison

Chocolat noir pointe de sel vs Himalayan

Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat noir pointe de selHimalayan
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 422 kcal 587 kcal
Fat 38 g 44 g
Saturated fat 23 g 0 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.5 g
Fiber 16 g 0 g
Protein 7.1 g 8 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat noir pointe de sel has 28% fewer calories (422 kcal vs 587 kcal).
  • Chocolat noir pointe de sel has 14% less fat (38 g vs 44 g).
  • Himalayan has no saturated fat, while Chocolat noir pointe de sel has 23 g.
  • Himalayan has no sugar, while Chocolat noir pointe de sel has 1.2 g.
  • Himalayan has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Chocolat noir pointe de sel has 100% more fiber (16 g vs 0 g).
  • Himalayan has 11% more protein (8 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Himalayan has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Himalayan is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Himalayan lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Chocolat noir pointe de sel

Pâte de cacao, édulcorant: érythritol, beurre de cacao, inuline, cacao maigre en poudre, sel de mer (0,8%), émulsifiant : lecithines, édulcorant: glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia, arôme naturel de vanille. Peut contenir des traces de lait, soja, fruits à coque, sésame.

Himalayan

Pâte de cacao, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, poudre de vanille naturelle, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat noir pointe de sel or Himalayan?

Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat noir pointe de sel has fewer calories: 422 kcal versus 587 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Himalayan has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons