Sel Rose de l'Himalaya vs Himalayan
Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sel Rose de l'Himalaya | Himalayan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 567 kcal | 587 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Himalayan has no saturated fat, while Sel Rose de l'Himalaya has 26 g.
- Himalayan has no sugar, while Sel Rose de l'Himalaya has 28 g.
- Sel Rose de l'Himalaya has 100% more fiber (11 g vs 0 g).
- Himalayan has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Himalayan lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Sel Rose de l'Himalaya
Pâte de cacao*, sucre de canne*, beurre de cacao*, sel rose de l'Himalaya, gousses de vanille*. *Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique. Peut contenir des traces de lait et de fruits à coque.
Himalayan
Pâte de cacao, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, poudre de vanille naturelle, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sel Rose de l'Himalaya or Himalayan?
Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sel Rose de l'Himalaya has fewer calories: 567 kcal versus 587 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Himalayan has less sugar: 0 g versus 28 g per 100 g.