Himalayan vs Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet
Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Himalayan | Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Sal... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 587 kcal | 585 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 28 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Himalayan has no saturated fat, while Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet has 28 g.
- Himalayan has no sugar, while Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet has 27 g.
- Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
- Himalayan has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Himalayan lists: Nuts.
- Only Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Himalayan
Pâte de cacao, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, poudre de vanille naturelle, sel.
Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet
Pâte de cacao, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, sel 0,4%, cacao 72%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Himalayan or Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet?
Overall, Himalayan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Extra Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Cachet has fewer calories: 585 kcal versus 587 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Himalayan has less sugar: 0 g versus 27 g per 100 g.