Comparison
Haricots géants vs Alubia blanca
Overall, Haricots géants has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots géants | Alubia blanca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 302 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 20.7 g | 19 g |
| Protein | 21.6 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots géants has 19% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Haricots géants has 70% less sugar (1.6 g vs 5.3 g).
Ingredients
Haricots géants
Haricots blancs.
Alubia blanca
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots géants or Alubia blanca?
Overall, Haricots géants has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alubia blanca has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 302 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots géants has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.