Comparison
Haricot Coco vs Alubia blanca
Overall, Haricot Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricot Coco | Alubia blanca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 302 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 16.8 g | 19 g |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricot Coco has 15% less fat (1.8 g vs 2.1 g).
- Haricot Coco has 64% less sugar (1.9 g vs 5.3 g).
- Alubia blanca has 12% more fiber (19 g vs 16.8 g).
Ingredients
Haricot Coco
100% Haricot Coco
Alubia blanca
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricot Coco or Alubia blanca?
Overall, Haricot Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alubia blanca has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 302 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricot Coco has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.