Comparison

Hanuta vs Wafers Bfb Hazelnut

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHanutaWafers Bfb Hazelnut
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 542 kcal 520 kcal
Fat 31.9 g 27 g
Saturated fat 13.7 g 22 g
Sugars 42.6 g 32 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.3 g
Protein 7.6 g 5.6 g
Additives34
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wafers Bfb Hazelnut has 15% less fat (27 g vs 31.9 g).
  • Hanuta has 38% less saturated fat (13.7 g vs 22 g).
  • Wafers Bfb Hazelnut has 25% less sugar (32 g vs 42.6 g).
  • Hanuta has 26% more protein (7.6 g vs 5.6 g).

Ingredients

Hanuta

Zucker, pflanzliche Fette (Palm, Shea), WEIZENMEHL (13,5 %), HASELNÜSSE (13%), SÜSSMOLKENPULVER, fettarmer Kakao, VOLLMILCH - SCHOKOLADE (Zucker, VOLLMILCHPULVER, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Vanillin), MAGERMILCHPULVER, BUTTERREINFETT, Salz, Halbbitterschokolade (Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Vanillin), Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Aromen, Traubenzucker, Backtriebmittel Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Vanillin.

Wafers Bfb Hazelnut

Huile de coco, farine de BLÉ, sirop de glucose, sucre, NOISETTES (9%) dans le fourrage, cacao maigre en poudre, dextrose, LAIT écrémé en poudre, LACTOSÉRUM en poudre, extrait de malt d'ORGE, émulsifiant: lécithines (SOJA), poudres à lever: carbonates de sodium, diphosphates; sel, arômes.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hanuta or Wafers Bfb Hazelnut?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wafers Bfb Hazelnut has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 542 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wafers Bfb Hazelnut has less sugar: 32 g versus 42.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons