Comparison

Kit kat pop choc vs Hanuta

Overall, Hanuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKit kat pop chocHanuta
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 530 kcal 542 kcal
Fat 30 g 31.9 g
Saturated fat 17 g 13.7 g
Sugars 41 g 42.6 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.4 g
Fiber 2.9 g —
Protein 7.8 g 7.6 g
Additives43
AllergensGluten, Milk, NutsGluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hanuta has 19% less saturated fat (13.7 g vs 17 g).
  • Only Hanuta lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Kit kat pop choc

Sucre, farine de BLÉ, poudre de LAIT ntai écrémé, matières grasses végétéales (palme, karité), beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, fèves de cacao caramélisés (5%) ZEI (fèves de cacao (2,9%), sucre, sirop de sucre caramélisé), NOISETTES (3,3%), matières grasses laitière anhydre diam (LAIT), agents d'enrobage (E 414, E 904), arôme naturel, émulsifiant (E 322), cacao maigre en poudre, poudre à lever (E 500).

Hanuta

Zucker, pflanzliche Fette (Palm, Shea), WEIZENMEHL (13,5 %), HASELNÜSSE (13%), SÜSSMOLKENPULVER, fettarmer Kakao, VOLLMILCH - SCHOKOLADE (Zucker, VOLLMILCHPULVER, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Vanillin), MAGERMILCHPULVER, BUTTERREINFETT, Salz, Halbbitterschokolade (Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Vanillin), Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Aromen, Traubenzucker, Backtriebmittel Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Vanillin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kit kat pop choc or Hanuta?

Overall, Hanuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kit kat pop choc has fewer calories: 530 kcal versus 542 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kit kat pop choc has less sugar: 41 g versus 42.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons