Hanuta vs Original Neapolitaner
Overall, Original Neapolitaner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hanuta | Original Neapolitaner |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 542 kcal | 485 kcal |
| Fat | 31.9 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.7 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 42.6 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Gluten, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Original Neapolitaner has 11% fewer calories (485 kcal vs 542 kcal).
- Original Neapolitaner has 31% less fat (22 g vs 31.9 g).
- Hanuta has 26% more protein (7.6 g vs 5.6 g).
- Only Hanuta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Hanuta
Zucker, pflanzliche Fette (Palm, Shea), WEIZENMEHL (13,5 %), HASELNÜSSE (13%), SÜSSMOLKENPULVER, fettarmer Kakao, VOLLMILCH - SCHOKOLADE (Zucker, VOLLMILCHPULVER, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Vanillin), MAGERMILCHPULVER, BUTTERREINFETT, Salz, Halbbitterschokolade (Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Vanillin), Emulgator Lecithine (SOJA), Aromen, Traubenzucker, Backtriebmittel Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Vanillin.
Original Neapolitaner
Zucker, Weizenmehl, Pflanzenfette (Kokos, Palm), Haselnüsse (12% in der Creme), mageres Kakaopulver, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat; Salz, Emulgator: Sojalecithin, natürliches Aroma
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hanuta or Original Neapolitaner?
Overall, Original Neapolitaner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original Neapolitaner has fewer calories: 485 kcal versus 542 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hanuta has less sugar: 42.6 g versus 46 g per 100 g.