Halva cu cacao vs Helva
Overall, Helva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Halva cu cacao | Helva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 581 kcal | 562 kcal |
| Fat | 40.5 g | 36 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 27.2 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Helva has 11% less fat (36 g vs 40.5 g).
- Helva has 86% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 10.5 g).
- Halva cu cacao has 32% less sugar (27.2 g vs 40 g).
- Helva has 23% more protein (13 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Halva cu cacao
Not available.
Helva
Pâte de sésame (52%), sucre, pistaches (8%), émulsifiant : mono-et diglycérides d'acide gras (végétale), extraits de saponaire officinale, acidifiant: acide citrique, arôme : vanille. Peut contenir des traces de noix, de lait et de soja.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Halva cu cacao or Helva?
Overall, Helva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Helva has fewer calories: 562 kcal versus 581 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Halva cu cacao has less sugar: 27.2 g versus 40 g per 100 g.