Hagelslag vs Tijgervlokken
Overall, Tijgervlokken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hagelslag | Tijgervlokken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 521 kcal | 447 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 61 g | 73 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | — |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tijgervlokken has 14% fewer calories (447 kcal vs 521 kcal).
- Tijgervlokken has 30% less fat (14 g vs 20 g).
- Tijgervlokken has 41% less saturated fat (10 g vs 17 g).
- Hagelslag has 16% less sugar (61 g vs 73 g).
- Hagelslag has 45% more protein (5.3 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Tijgervlokken lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Hagelslag
Not available.
Tijgervlokken
Tijgervlokken: suiker, geheel gehard palmpitvet, magere cacaopoeder*, cacaoboter*, dextrose, magere MELKPOEDER, TARWEZETMEEL, LACTOSE, gefractioneerd MELKVET (harde fractie), KARNEMELKPOEDER, emulgator (SOJALECITHINE), natuurlijk aroma, kleurstof (paprika-extract)., Funnies: suiker, cacaoboter*, magere MELKPOEDER, WEIPOEDER, emulgator (SOJALECITHINE), aroma, kleurstoffen (E141, E160c), wortelextract., *Rainforest Alliance gecertificeerd.ra.org
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hagelslag or Tijgervlokken?
Overall, Tijgervlokken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tijgervlokken has fewer calories: 447 kcal versus 521 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hagelslag has less sugar: 61 g versus 73 g per 100 g.