Comparison

Haferdrink vs Kokos-Reis Drink

Overall, Kokos-Reis Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaferdrinkKokos-Reis Drink
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 46 kcal 23 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 1.2 g
Sugars 5.7 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 1.1 g 0.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kokos-Reis Drink has 50% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 46 kcal).
  • Haferdrink has 38% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Haferdrink has 83% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Kokos-Reis Drink has 74% less sugar (1.5 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Haferdrink has 73% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Kokos-Reis Drink has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Haferdrink

CH Bio Hafer Drink, aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft, UHT. Zutaten: Wasser, 11,5 % Vollkornhafer, Sonnenblumenöl*, Meersalz. *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Weizen, Dinkel, Roggen, Gerste, Erdnüssen, Mandeln, Haselnüssen, Walnüssen, Cashewnüssen, Pecannüssen, Paranüssen, Macadamianüssen, Soja und Sesamsamen enthalten. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Oberseite. Nach Anbruch 5 Tage im Kühlschrank haltbar (max. +7 °C). Vor Gebrauch schütteln. Boisson bio à base d'avoine,

Kokos-Reis Drink

Wasser, Kokosmilch 5,3% (Kokoscreme 80%, Wasser), fermentiertes Reismehl 3,4%, Meersalz

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haferdrink or Kokos-Reis Drink?

Overall, Kokos-Reis Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kokos-Reis Drink has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kokos-Reis Drink has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons