Comparison
Guanciale vs Guanciale Sticks
Overall, Guanciale Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Guanciale | Guanciale Sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 676 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 70 g | 57 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Guanciale Sticks has 45% fewer calories (373 kcal vs 676 kcal).
- Guanciale Sticks has 19% less fat (57 g vs 70 g).
- Guanciale Sticks has 19% less saturated fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- Guanciale Sticks has 14% less salt (3 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Guanciale
Not available.
Guanciale Sticks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Guanciale or Guanciale Sticks?
Overall, Guanciale Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Guanciale Sticks has fewer calories: 373 kcal versus 676 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Guanciale has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.