Guanciale vs Guanciale a stick
Overall, Guanciale a stick has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Guanciale | Guanciale a stick |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 676 kcal | 559 kcal |
| Fat | 70 g | 57 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Guanciale a stick has 17% fewer calories (559 kcal vs 676 kcal).
- Guanciale a stick has 19% less fat (57 g vs 70 g).
- Guanciale a stick has 19% less saturated fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- Guanciale a stick has 17% less salt (2.9 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Guanciale
Not available.
Guanciale a stick
CARNE DI SUINO, SALE, AROMI NATURALI, SPEZIE. ANTIOSSIDANTE: ASCORBATO DI SODIO. CONSERVANTE NITRITO DI SODIO, NITRATO DI POTASSIO.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Guanciale or Guanciale a stick?
Overall, Guanciale a stick has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Guanciale a stick has fewer calories: 559 kcal versus 676 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Guanciale has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.