Comparison

Gravy vs Fix für Chili con Carne

Overall, Gravy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGravyFix für Chili con Carne
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 32 kcal 133 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 7.5 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0.1 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0.1 g 2.4 g
Protein 0.2 g 8.8 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gravy has 76% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 133 kcal).
  • Gravy has 72% less fat (2.1 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Gravy has 50% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Gravy has 94% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Fix für Chili con Carne has 96% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Fix für Chili con Carne has 98% more protein (8.8 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Only Gravy lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Gravy

Potato Starch, Palm Oil. Salt. Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, calcium Carbonate. Iron. Niacin. Thiamin), Beef Fat, Flavourings (Milk, Wheat, Soya), Barley Malt Extract, Maltodextrin, (Soya Lecithins), Onion Oil.

Fix für Chili con Carne

44,5% Tomaten, Gewürze (6,8% Paprika, Pfeffer, Chili, Knoblauch, Kreuzkümmel, Ingwer), Kartoffelstärke, Jodsalz (Salz, Kaliumjodat), Zucker, Würze (aus Weizen), Kräuter (2,2% Petersilie, Salbei, Bohnenkraut, Oregano, Thymian, Lorbeerblätter), geräucherter Speck (Speck, Salz, Rauch), Salz, natürliche Aromen, Zwiebeln, Paprikaextrakt, natürliches Zwiebelaroma mit anderen natürlichen Aromen, Raucharoma

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gravy or Fix für Chili con Carne?

Overall, Gravy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gravy has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gravy has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons