Græskarkerneboller vs Bagetka
Overall, Græskarkerneboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Græskarkerneboller | Bagetka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 266 kcal | 270 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 7.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bagetka has 87% less fat (0.7 g vs 5.2 g).
- Bagetka has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Græskarkerneboller has 45% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Græskarkerneboller has 39% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Græskarkerneboller has 64% more fiber (7.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Græskarkerneboller has 11% more protein (11 g vs 9.8 g).
- Græskarkerneboller has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bagetka is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Græskarkerneboller
Fuldkornshvedemel 38%, vand, hvedemel, græskarkerner 8%, hvedegluten, havreflager 1%, sukker, salt tilsat jod, rapsolie, gær, fortykningsmiddel (guargummi), bygmaltekstrakt, emulgator (mono - og diacetylvinsyreestere af mono - og diglycerider af fedtsyrer), druesukker, melbehandlingsmiddel (askorbinsyre), hvedemaltmel. Kan indeholde spor af sesamfrø.
Bagetka
BÚZALISZT, víz, élesztő, jódozott étkezési só (étkezési só, kálium-jodát), lisztkezelő szer (aszkorbinsav)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Græskarkerneboller or Bagetka?
Overall, Græskarkerneboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Græskarkerneboller has fewer calories: 266 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Græskarkerneboller has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.