Gouda jung in Scheiben vs Höhlenkäse
Overall, Höhlenkäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda jung in Scheiben | Höhlenkäse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 341 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 27.9 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.3 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Höhlenkäse has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Gouda jung in Scheiben
Pasteurisierte MILCH, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten MILCH), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
Höhlenkäse
_Milch_, Speisesalz , Milchsäurekulturen (enthält _Milch_) mikrobielles Lab, Rotschmierkulturen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda jung in Scheiben or Höhlenkäse?
Overall, Höhlenkäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda jung in Scheiben has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda jung in Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.