Gouda Holland jung vs Gouda Holland mittealt
Overall, Gouda Holland jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda Holland jung | Gouda Holland mittealt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 32.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.3 g | 22.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 25.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda Holland jung has 19% less saturated fat (18.3 g vs 22.7 g).
- Only Gouda Holland jung lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Gouda Holland jung
Pasteurisierte Milch, Salz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Farbstoff: Carotin; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrat.
Gouda Holland mittealt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda Holland jung or Gouda Holland mittealt?
Overall, Gouda Holland jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Holland jung has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda Holland jung has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.