Gouda Holland vs Gouda Holland mittealt
Overall, Gouda Holland mittealt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda Holland | Gouda Holland mittealt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 32.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 22.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 25.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda Holland mittealt has no sugar, while Gouda Holland has 0.5 g.
- Only Gouda Holland lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Gouda Holland
LAIT de vache pasteurisé (origine : Pays-Bas),sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant microbien, colorant : caroténoïdes. Croûte non consommable.
Gouda Holland mittealt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda Holland or Gouda Holland mittealt?
Overall, Gouda Holland mittealt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Holland has fewer calories: 368 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda Holland mittealt has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.