Gouda Holland vs Gouda Holland jung
Overall, Gouda Holland jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda Holland | Gouda Holland jung |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 18.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda Holland jung has 13% less saturated fat (18.3 g vs 21 g).
- Gouda Holland jung has no sugar, while Gouda Holland has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Gouda Holland
LAIT de vache pasteurisé (origine : Pays-Bas),sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant microbien, colorant : caroténoïdes. Croûte non consommable.
Gouda Holland jung
Pasteurisierte Milch, Salz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Farbstoff: Carotin; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda Holland or Gouda Holland jung?
Overall, Gouda Holland jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Holland has fewer calories: 368 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda Holland jung has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.