Comparison
Goldsaft vs Lyle's Golden Syrup
Overall, Goldsaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldsaft | Lyle's Golden Syrup |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 305 kcal | 317 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 79 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lyle's Golden Syrup has no fat, while Goldsaft has 0.5 g.
- Goldsaft has 16% less sugar (66 g vs 79 g).
- Goldsaft has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
- Goldsaft has 100% more fiber (4.5 g vs 0 g).
- Goldsaft has 87% more protein (2.3 g vs 0.3 g).
- Goldsaft has the better Nutri-Score.
- Goldsaft is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Goldsaft
Zuckerrübensirup
Lyle's Golden Syrup
partially inverted refiners syrup.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldsaft or Lyle's Golden Syrup?
Overall, Goldsaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Goldsaft has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Goldsaft has less sugar: 66 g versus 79 g per 100 g.