Comparison
Goldsaft vs Black Treacle
Overall, Goldsaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldsaft | Black Treacle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 305 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 66.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Black Treacle has 26% fewer calories (227 kcal vs 305 kcal).
- Black Treacle has no fat, while Goldsaft has 0.5 g.
- Goldsaft has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Goldsaft has 100% more fiber (4.5 g vs 0 g).
- Goldsaft has 48% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Goldsaft has the better Nutri-Score.
- Goldsaft is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Goldsaft
Zuckerrübensirup
Black Treacle
cane molasses
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldsaft or Black Treacle?
Overall, Goldsaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Black Treacle has fewer calories: 227 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Goldsaft has less sugar: 66 g versus 66.8 g per 100 g.