Comparison
Golden Syrup vs Black Treacle
Overall, Black Treacle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Golden Syrup | Black Treacle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 79 g | 66.8 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Black Treacle has 29% fewer calories (227 kcal vs 320 kcal).
- Black Treacle has 15% less sugar (66.8 g vs 79 g).
- Black Treacle has 75% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.3 g).
- Black Treacle is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Golden Syrup
Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup
Black Treacle
cane molasses
FAQ
Which is healthier: Golden Syrup or Black Treacle?
Overall, Black Treacle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Black Treacle has fewer calories: 227 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Black Treacle has less sugar: 66.8 g versus 79 g per 100 g.