Comparison

Gold Standard 100% Whey Double Rich Chocolate vs Iso whey zero

Overall, Iso whey zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGold Standard 100% Whey Doub...Iso whey zero
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 374 kcal 372 kcal
Fat 4.5 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 1 g
Sugars 3.2 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.3 g —
Protein 77.4 g 84 g
Additives50
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Iso whey zero has 65% less fat (1.6 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Iso whey zero has 38% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Iso whey zero has 75% less sugar (0.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Only Gold Standard 100% Whey Double Rich Chocolate lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Gold Standard 100% Whey Double Rich Chocolate

_Whey_ Protein Blend (93%) [_Milk] (_Whey_ Protein Isolate, _Whey_ Protein Concentrate, Hydrolysed _Whey_ Protein Isolate, Emulsifier: _Soy_ Lecithin). Fat-Reduced Cocoa Powder, Flavourings, Thickener (Xanthan Gum), Sweeteners (Sucralose, Acesulfame K).

Iso whey zero

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gold Standard 100% Whey Double Rich Chocolate or Iso whey zero?

Overall, Iso whey zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Iso whey zero has fewer calories: 372 kcal versus 374 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Iso whey zero has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons