Comparison

Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle vs Liebig légumes et kiri

Overall, Liebig légumes et kiri has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGlace Macadamia Nut BrittleLiebig légumes et kiri
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 274 kcal 51 kcal
Fat 17.3 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 10.6 g 1.6 g
Sugars 24.2 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.1 g 1 g
Protein 4 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedCelery, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Liebig légumes et kiri has 81% fewer calories (51 kcal vs 274 kcal).
  • Liebig légumes et kiri has 86% less fat (2.5 g vs 17.3 g).
  • Liebig légumes et kiri has 85% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 10.6 g).
  • Liebig légumes et kiri has 94% less sugar (1.5 g vs 24.2 g).
  • Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle has 76% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Liebig légumes et kiri has 90% more fiber (1 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle has 80% more protein (4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Liebig légumes et kiri has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Liebig légumes et kiri lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle

Häagen-Dazs MACADAMIA NUT BRITTLE TM

Liebig légumes et kiri

Eau, carotte, jus de tomates à base de concentré, pomme de terre, oignon,fromage Kiri 3,1%, amidon de maïs, blanc de poireau, beurre de cuisine, potiron, petit pois, céleri-rave, sel, arômes naturels

FAQ

Which is healthier: Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle or Liebig légumes et kiri?

Overall, Liebig légumes et kiri has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Liebig légumes et kiri has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 274 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Liebig légumes et kiri has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 24.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons