Comparison

Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle vs 8 palets de légumes

Overall, 8 palets de légumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGlace Macadamia Nut Brittle8 palets de légumes
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 274 kcal 120 kcal
Fat 17.3 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 10.6 g 0.5 g
Sugars 24.2 g 3.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.1 g 3.2 g
Protein 4 g 4.9 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 8 palets de légumes has 56% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 274 kcal).
  • 8 palets de légumes has 79% less fat (3.6 g vs 17.3 g).
  • 8 palets de légumes has 95% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 10.6 g).
  • 8 palets de légumes has 87% less sugar (3.1 g vs 24.2 g).
  • Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle has 82% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • 8 palets de légumes has 97% more fiber (3.2 g vs 0.1 g).
  • 8 palets de légumes has 18% more protein (4.9 g vs 4 g).
  • 8 palets de légumes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only 8 palets de légumes lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle

Häagen-Dazs MACADAMIA NUT BRITTLE TM

8 palets de légumes

Courgettes 35%, carottes 25%, petits pois 18%, oignons 12%, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza), amidon modifié de pomme de terre, blanc d'œuf en poudre, œuf entier en poudre, sel, plantes aromatiques, ail en poudre, extrait de levures, poivre. Traces de céleri, gluten, lait, poissons et soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Glace Macadamia Nut Brittle or 8 palets de légumes?

Overall, 8 palets de légumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

8 palets de légumes has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 274 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

8 palets de légumes has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 24.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons