Comparison

Gefriergetrocknete Himbeerstücke vs Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande

Overall, Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGefriergetrocknete Himbeerst...Framboise, cassis, pomme & t...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — —
Calories 289 kcal 38 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 34 g 8.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 33 g 0.5 g
Protein 8.9 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has 87% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 289 kcal).
  • Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has 80% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has 74% less sugar (8.7 g vs 34 g).
  • Gefriergetrocknete Himbeerstücke has 98% more fiber (33 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Gefriergetrocknete Himbeerstücke has 94% more protein (8.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Gefriergetrocknete Himbeerstücke

100% Himbeerstücke

Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande

6 pommes pressées (89%, 15 ½ framboises écrasées (4,8 %), eau de pomme, 16 1/2 baies de cassis mixées 1,7%, betterave pressée, extrait de lavande

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gefriergetrocknete Himbeerstücke or Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande?

Overall, Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 289 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Framboise, cassis, pomme & twist de lavande has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 34 g per 100 g.

More comparisons