Comparison

Gambas sauvages tigrées vs Garnelen

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Gambas sauvages tigrées	Garnelen
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	—
Calories	91 kcal	66 kcal
Fat	0.8 g	0.7 g
Saturated fat	0.2 g	0.2 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0.4 g	0.3 g
Protein	21 g	15 g
Additives	1	0
Allergens	Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Garnelen has 27% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 91 kcal).
Gambas sauvages tigrées has 29% more protein (21 g vs 15 g).
Only Gambas sauvages tigrées lists: Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Gambas sauvages tigrées

Crevette (_crustacé_Penaeus monodon, pêchée aux chaluts en Océan Indien Ouest et Est), antioxydant : _disulfite_ de sodium.

Garnelen

White Tiger Garnelen, Wasser*.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gambas sauvages tigrées or Garnelen?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Garnelen has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gambas sauvages tigrées has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Gambas sauvages tigrées vs Crevettes du Pacifique Queues De Crevettes Crue... vs Garnelen Crevettes Cocktail vs Garnelen Gambas sauvages tigrées vs Crevettes Cocktail Crevettes du Pacifique vs Garnelen Queues De Crevettes Crue... vs Gambas sauvages tigrées Raw Red Shrimp vs Garnelen Raw Red Shrimp vs Gambas sauvages tigrées