Queues De Crevettes Crues, Carapace Coupée vs Garnelen
Overall, Garnelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Queues De Crevettes Crues, C... | Garnelen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garnelen has 30% less fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Only Queues De Crevettes Crues, Carapace Coupée lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Queues De Crevettes Crues, Carapace Coupée
_Crevette_ (_crustacé_) (Penaeus vannamei élevée au Vietnam).
Garnelen
White Tiger Garnelen, Wasser*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Queues De Crevettes Crues, Carapace Coupée or Garnelen?
Overall, Garnelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garnelen has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queues De Crevettes Crues, Carapace Coupée has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.