Raw Red Shrimp vs Gambas sauvages tigrées
Overall, Gambas sauvages tigrées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raw Red Shrimp | Gambas sauvages tigrées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Raw Red Shrimp has 41% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Raw Red Shrimp has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Gambas sauvages tigrées has 45% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Gambas sauvages tigrées has 33% more protein (21 g vs 14 g).
- Gambas sauvages tigrées is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Gambas sauvages tigrées lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Raw Red Shrimp
Raw Shrimp, Salt
Gambas sauvages tigrées
Crevette (_crustacé_Penaeus monodon, pêchée aux chaluts en Océan Indien Ouest et Est), antioxydant : _disulfite_ de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raw Red Shrimp or Gambas sauvages tigrées?
Overall, Gambas sauvages tigrées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Raw Red Shrimp has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raw Red Shrimp has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.