Comparison
Fussili vs Fusilli No. 34
Overall, Fusilli No. 34 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fussili | Fusilli No. 34 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Hartweizengrieß |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilli No. 34 has 21% less fat (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Fusilli No. 34 has 63% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Fussili has 12% less sugar (3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Fussili has 76% more fiber (12 g vs 2.9 g).
- Fusilli No. 34 has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Only Fusilli No. 34 lists: Hartweizengrieß.
Ingredients
Fussili
Hartweizengrieß 100%
Fusilli No. 34
Hartweizengrieß
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fussili or Fusilli No. 34?
Overall, Fusilli No. 34 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli No. 34 has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fussili has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.