Comparison
Fusilli No. 34 vs Fusilli No 48
Overall, Fusilli No 48 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusilli No. 34 | Fusilli No 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Hartweizengrieß | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilli No 48 has 18% less sugar (2.8 g vs 3.4 g).
- Fusilli No 48 has 53% more fiber (6.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Fusilli No. 34 lists: Hartweizengrieß.
Ingredients
Fusilli No. 34
Hartweizengrieß
Fusilli No 48
Durumhvede
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusilli No. 34 or Fusilli No 48?
Overall, Fusilli No 48 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli No. 34 has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fusilli No 48 has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.