Comparison
Fusilli No 48 vs Fusilli Integrale
Overall, Fusilli No 48 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusilli No 48 | Fusilli Integrale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 347 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilli No 48 has 36% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Fusilli No 48 has 20% less sugar (2.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Fusilli Integrale has 22% more fiber (8 g vs 6.2 g).
- Fusilli No 48 has 10% more protein (14.5 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Fusilli No 48
Durumhvede
Fusilli Integrale
Vollkorn-_Hartweizengrieß_, Wasser,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusilli No 48 or Fusilli Integrale?
Overall, Fusilli No 48 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli Integrale has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fusilli No 48 has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.