Comparison
Fussili vs Fusilli No 48
Overall, Fusilli No 48 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fussili | Fusilli No 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilli No 48 has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Fussili has 48% more fiber (12 g vs 6.2 g).
- Fusilli No 48 has 17% more protein (14.5 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Fussili
Hartweizengrieß 100%
Fusilli No 48
Durumhvede
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fussili or Fusilli No 48?
Overall, Fusilli No 48 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli No 48 has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fusilli No 48 has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3 g per 100 g.