Comparison
Bio Fusilli vs Fusilli No. 34
Overall, Bio Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Fusilli | Fusilli No. 34 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Hartweizengrieß |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Fusilli has 20% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Bio Fusilli has 17% more fiber (3.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Fusilli No. 34 has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Only Fusilli No. 34 lists: Hartweizengrieß.
Ingredients
Bio Fusilli
Hartweizengrieß
Fusilli No. 34
Hartweizengrieß
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Fusilli or Fusilli No. 34?
Overall, Bio Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Fusilli has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Fusilli has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.