Fusilli vs Gluten Free Rotini
Overall, Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusilli | Gluten Free Rotini |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 168 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilli has 50% fewer calories (168 kcal vs 339 kcal).
- Fusilli has 33% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Gluten Free Rotini has no saturated fat, while Fusilli has 0.4 g.
- Gluten Free Rotini has no sugar, while Fusilli has 0.5 g.
- Gluten Free Rotini has 54% more protein (7.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Fusilli has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fusilli
Rice flour, wholegrain rice flour, maize flour, quinoa flour, emulsifier: mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids
Gluten Free Rotini
corn flour, rice flour, mono and diglycerides,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusilli or Gluten Free Rotini?
Overall, Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli has fewer calories: 168 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gluten Free Rotini has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.